Analysis of Comments on a New York Times Article Essay

The hold, obligate From Executive Pay to periodical Wage, which was indite by Michael Luo and was published in the recent York Times last February 28, 2009, basic eachy told the recital of volume who used to earn tail fin or six-figure amounts per year, are right away be paid periodic minimum wages. unitary example in the article was the example of Mark Cooper, who used to earn $70,000 as a security manager for fortune 500 Comp all in the unify States and who oversees a budget of $1. 2 million. lodge months ago, he lost his hire out and now he is earning $12 an hour in his job at his friends janitorial services company. Although the article itself is appealing enough, it is similarly interesting to n one(a) the refs comments virtu completelyy it. As of now, there are 300 comments about the article and upon reviewing most of them, it can be surmised that each reader who commented had significantly una identical viewpoints and opinions about the story told in the new-fashioned York Times article.Evidently, these readers adhere to different moral codes which are seen through their responses. In general, the readers who commented on the article can be shared into two groups one group lauded the brook act of Mark Cooper objet dart the separate criticized the style of writing and the knotty message that pertly York Times source used in the article. One of the readers who praised the article story admire the courage of Mr.Cooper as he was able to lower his pride and instal ways to provide for his family even if it incidentor that he has to scrub toilets and hand over his pay dramatically reduced from five figures to an hourly wage without any benefits. In a sense, this group highly regarded the value of elusive work and starting all over again in a self-respectful way. Most of their comments basically indicated that Mr. Cooper is not alone and that there are hundreds of Americans who have similar inscrutablees to rags stories.Thes e readers, based on their comments, excessively believed that there is no mortify being poor as capacious as one has a dignify and lawful job. On other hand, the other group of readers who commented on the article criticized the New York Times for insinuating that those who work blue-collar jobs are lower forms of human beings than those who work clerical ones. They see the article as shrewd to Americans who have been living their lives below the want line for a long prison term even before the current sparing crisis.For example, one reader lamented that article more or less showed that a $12-an-hour job is an indecent way of living, which is not true. In addition, one reader did not note sorry for Mr. Cooper and commented that he had a dance orchestra to be thankful for because he lives in an above average class and was able to live a rich life. To this reader, the economic crisis makes everyone in America couple because they are struggling to make ends meet. However, whats common in all the readers responses is that they could all relate to the difficulties experienced by the people depicted in the article.In fact some of the readers, who are evidently from different walks of life, shared their own stories in their comments. In other words, the single factor that binds all the readers who commented is the hardship brought about by the financial crisis in America. In a way, the articles comments show two things one is that there are a lot of Americans who are so used to a good life that they are obviously caught off-guard when a devastating financial crisis like this hits them and the other is that due to the crisis, most Americans would be willing to take on any job just to survive.But the comments also indicated that Americans are more unified in achieving a common goal which is to receive from the devastating effects of the crisis and rebuild their lives. industrial plant Cited Luo, Mark. Forced From Executive Pay to Hourly Wage. 28 Febr uary 2009. New York Times. 4 manifest 2009 http//www. nytimes. com/2009/03/01/us/01survival. html? pagewanted=1&_r=2&sq=executive%20janitor&st=cse&scp=1.